Wednesday, October 28, 2009

Update: Xilinx Simulation

With the recent official release of Windows 7, I decided to update my laptop to 64-bit Windows 7 instead of Vista 32-bit. The process was for the most part, completely painless. But by switching to a 64-bit OS an interesting problem (or more correctly, an annoyance) showed up when trying to simulate some HDL code I have been working on.

It turns out that Xilinx ISE does not have much support for 64-bit asside from generating bit files. When trying to simulate in ISE in 64-bit mode you will notice that you are limited to ModelSIM which I am not that familiar with, but I definiately didn't have much luck with it.

If you are looking to simulate some HDL in the 64-bit ISE, your best chances for success is to use the 32-bit ISE instead. Luckilly, Xilinx was nice and installed the 32-bit programs when you installed 64-bit ISE. Just go to your Program Files Xilinx Folder and locate the 32-bit ISE. It will launch with your current project and settings which makes it a little more bareable when switching between the two ISE programs.

Before you can actually start simulating, you will need to go into your Project settings and change your simulator to ISim (ISE Simulator program). To do this just go to:

Project -> Design Properties -> Simulator -> ISim (VHDL/Verilog)

And your done.

Now if you switch to Behavioral Simulation Mode, you can select your corresponding HDL file you wish to simulate and you will see the "Simulate Behavioral Model" Option appear.

1 comment:

  1. Simulation is about feeding the the meaningful data to the modules under test in the right time. it is very tedious for using the the simulation for verification. in order to use the simulation, you have to learn the tool, set up the environment, program the inputs data by hand, and wait long time for the simulation to complete.

    It might not a good idea to use simulation directly. using tools to shell the simulation might make it more usable. (HDL verification tool from MathWorks might be in that direction.

    ReplyDelete